Seven Deadly Sins Test

Seven Deadly Sins Test

Welcome to Seven Deadly Sins Test

Instructions:

  • There is no time limit for this test. Please answer at your own pace.
  • This test consists of 21 questions in total.
  • The next question will appear automatically after you select an answer.
  • You can return to modify your answer using the "Previous" button.
  • All test results on this site are for reference only and do not constitute professional advice.

Seven Deadly Sins Test

1. What the Seven Deadly Sins Test measures

Pride, envy, wrath, sloth, greed, gluttony and lust come from an ethical tradition. They named the directions in which people tend to slip; they were never a map of personality. Used as a quiz scale they slide quickly into moral scoring, where the more you resemble the description, the worse a person you are supposed to be.

This test does something different: it translates the seven words into seven observable everyday tendencies. It does not ask whether you are a bad-tempered person. It asks whether, when someone cuts in line, your jaw tightens before you have decided anything. It does not ask whether you are greedy. It asks whether, when something is already enough, you still want a little more. Three items per dimension, each set in a concrete scene, describing only how often and how hard a reaction fires on its own.

The approach borrows from research that treats the seven deadly sins as measurable individual differences (the Vices and Virtues Scales and related work), and from the secular mapping personality psychology now uses for the same seven words: pride to narcissism and hubris, envy to upward social comparison, wrath to anger and hostility, sloth to procrastination and self-control failure, greed to materialism, gluttony to emotional eating and impulse buying, lust to attention seeking and novelty seeking.

There are 21 items with four options, and it takes about three to five minutes. What comes back is a seven-axis profile plus the pattern most likely to fire first, not a verdict. The profile moves when your circumstances move, and that movement is the useful part.

2. What each dimension looks at

Pride - the visibility of self-worth: how much your value depends on being seen and recognized. The three observation points are whether you look for a position above others, whether criticism starts as curiosity or defense, and whether interaction becomes a place to compare ability. This measures not confidence but how much confidence needs an external echo.

Envy - the automaticity of upward comparison: whether someone else's advantage gets read as your own deficit. The three points are the faint discomfort at another person's good news, whether congratulations come in the first second, and the ranking that runs in your head. In an era when comparison data is one swipe away, this channel fires easily.

Wrath - reaction speed when a boundary is touched: how much time sits between being crossed and reacting. The three points are the physical arousal from a small provocation, whether anger goes direct or indirect through silence and flat affect, and the rationalization afterwards. Anger itself is a boundary signal; this dimension looks at what happens to the signal next.

Sloth - startup cost: how much resistance sits between knowing what to do and actually beginning. The three points are task initiation, whether rhythm holds without an external deadline, and the habit of repackaging avoidance as doing it properly tomorrow. It is not about ability; it is about the psychological price of the switch from still to running.

Greed - safety bought with having more: how much of your security comes from quantity. The three points are the ongoing pull toward more, the over-alertness when resources drop, and reading a person's worth through what they own. What marks this channel is that the threshold rises together with the holdings.

Gluttony - intake used to regulate feeling: intake here is not only food. It includes feeds, short video and spending. The three points are emotional overconsumption, difficulty stopping at enough, and the loop of promise and repeat afterwards.

Lust - attention and novelty: how easily attention is captured by attraction cues. The three points are whether attention drifts with external cues, whether you enjoy being desired, and the trade-off between novelty and staying. What it measures is tolerance for staying in one place, not relationship status.

3. How to read your scores

Each dimension has three items scored 1 to 4, so a dimension lands between 3 and 12. Three bands are enough:

  • 3-6 (low): the channel rarely fires on its own and usually needs a strong situation to start
  • 7-9 (moderate): it shows up in specific scenes, you notice it afterwards, and it returns to baseline
  • 10-12 (high): the channel sits on standby, and it is usually the default reaction with the least effort behind it

The highest dimension becomes the dominant type; the second highest becomes the secondary tone. If the gap between them is 2 points or less, the result is reported as mixed dominance and both lines are shown. If all seven dimensions sit at 6 or below, the result is a low-activation profile with no single label.

Three notes. First, the dominant type is not a statement about which sin you are. It answers a narrower question: at this stage of your life, which reaction is most likely to fire on its own, in other words which old pattern costs the least. Second, scores carry no moral ranking: every channel has a function at low intensity and a price at high intensity. Third, the result describes roughly the past six months, not a fixed personality.

4. What each dominant type looks like

  • King in the Mirror (pride): good at projecting certainty, with self-worth tied to being seen; criticism lands as a threat to the whole structure of the self
  • Comparator (envy): an automatic radar for other people's advantages, which shows you every gap and makes it hard to rest on what you already have
  • Boundary Guard (wrath): fast and strong reactions, with anger as quick armor over something softer; rationalization afterwards keeps it from ever being digested
  • Low-Power Mode (sloth): highly sensitive to startup cost, good at conserving energy, and good at packaging avoidance as needing to recharge
  • Accumulator (greed): safety through more, with strong goal focus and reserves, and a threshold for enough that keeps moving out of reach
  • Filler (gluttony): regulates feeling through intake and gives itself quick comfort, while the border of enough blurs
  • Thrill Seeker (lust): attention caught by what is new and attractive, high vitality, and more difficulty with the staying that depth requires

Mixed dominance describes two channels running close together. Pride with envy, for instance, hardens both the need to be seen and the sensitivity to where others stand. Wrath with sloth means the feeling arrives first and the handling arrives later, which is where rationalization finds room. A low-activation profile means none of the seven directions stands out; situation and values do more of the steering, and a single label would carry less information than it seems to.

5. When it is useful, and where it stops

  • Self-observation: to locate the step you keep getting stuck on, instead of filing it under a bad character
  • Unpacking a reaction: to break a conflict or a stretch of rumination into seven directions you can name
  • Re-testing over time: two or three months apart, to see which dimension is rising and which is falling
  • Shared vocabulary: in a team or a couple, replacing you always with a specific dimension lowers the moral charge of the conversation

Answer from how you actually reacted most of the time over the past six months, not from how you should react, and not from the version of yourself you would like to present. The seven words are descriptive tools here. They are not for grading your own or anyone else's character, and no dimension is better when the score is lower.

This is a self-assessment, not a diagnosis. If one dimension has stayed high for a long time and carries a clear functional cost, whether in sleep, work, relationships or money, the thing worth working on is that specific problem, not the label of sin. Professional assessment tends to help more than testing again in those cases.